Back to top

Archaeological Reassessment of Project STP-115-1 (7), White County

Author(s)
Report Number
10379
Year of Publication
2004
Abstract

“In compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and amendments thereto, project STP-115-1(7), White County has been surveyed with respect to archaeological resources, especially those on or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP)”. The purpose of the survey was to locate, identify and evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources within the proposed project’s area of potential environmental effect (APE).

                Project STP-115-1(7) would widen a section of SR 75 in the city of Cleveland in White County. The project was subjected to a previous survey by Teresa Lotti in December, 2000 and September, 2003 (HPD# HP001207-005). Since that time the project description, and therefore, project APE has changed. The new changes to the proposed project include relocating Ash Street on the south side of SR 75 120 feet west of its present location. In addition, the project will also require more easements of varying sizes throughout the project corridor. The existing right-of-way for Ash Street is 25 feet. The required right-of-way for Ash Street is approximately 60 feet on new location for 240 feet. An archaeological survey consistent with the proposed project description was conducted along the entire length of the project corridor.

                An archaeological survey (Level II) was conducted in accordance with “GDOT/FHWA Cultural Resource Survey Guidelines” developed by the GDOT Staff Archaeologists in consultation with DNR Historic Preservation Section Staff and concurred in by the Federal Highway Administration and State Historic Preservation Officer. These guidelines provide general survey boundaries and methodological approaches to archaeological surveys based on the type/scope of proposed highway projects and are followed during the initial identification of archaeological resources.

                No existing or eligible National Register archaeological resources were located within the project’s area of potential environmental effect. It is concluded, therefore, that the project will have no effect upon archaeological resources on or eligible for inclusion in the NRHP provided that the project conforms to that described above.