Back to top

Archaeological Assessment of Project STP-00MS(188), Lumpkin/Union/White Counties

Author(s)
Report Number
11770
Year of Publication
1996
Abstract

In compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and amendments thereto, project STP- 00MS(188), Lumpkin/Union/White Counties has been surveyed with respect to archaeological resources, especially those on or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The purpose of the survey was to locate, identify and evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources within the proposed project's area of potential environmental effect. The proposed project would involve the repainting of the existing bridges at 16 locations in Lumpkin, Union, and White Counties. Existing right-of-way varies from bridge to bridge. All construction will be limited to the existing right-of-way. An archaeological survey consistent with the project description was conducted at the following bridge locations:

County

Lumpkin

Union

White

Stream Crossing

Etowah River

Cane Creek

Etowah River

Yahoola Creek

Chestatee River

Yahoola Creek

Chestatee River

Yahoola Creek

Chestatee River

Chestatee River

Suches Creek

Slaughter Creek

Little Tesnatee Creek

Chattahoochee River

Chattahoochee River

Chickamauga Creek

BQadll!aY

SR 9

SR 9

SR 52

SR 52

SR 52

us 19 Bus.

SR 60

SR 60

us 19 NB

us 19 SB

SR 60

SR 180

us 129

SR 17

SR 75

SR 255

An archaeological survey (Level I) was conducted in accordance with "GDOT/FHWA Cultural Resource Survey Guidelines" developed by the GDOT Staff Archaeologists in consultation with DNR. Historic Preservation Section Staff and concurred in by the Federal Highway Administration and State Historic Preservation Officer. These guidelines provide general survey boundaries and methodological approaches to archaeological surveys based on the type/scope of proposed highway projects and are followed during the initial identification of archaeological resources.

No existing or eligible National Register archaeological resources were located within the project's area of potential environmental effect. It is concluded, therefore, that the project will have no effect upon archaeological resources on or eligible f or inclusion in the NRHP provided that the project conforms to that described above.