Back to top

Section 106 Review TCNS ID 194163, Proposed 320-Foot Tall Guyed-Type Telecommunications Structure (Overall Height Including Appurtenances), AT&T Site GNL06390, FA#14996938, 1170 CM Copelan Road, Madison, Greene County, Georgia, ECA Project No. V3095

Author(s)
Report Number
13849
Year of Publication
2020
Abstract

Environmental Corporation of America’s (ECA) client, AT&T Mobility, LLC is proposing to construct a telecommunications facility as described in the following FCC Form 620, New Tower (NT) Submission packet. ECA understands that AT&T mobility, LLC plans to construct a 320-foot overall height guyed-type telecommunications structure within a 100-foot by 100-foot (30m by 30m) lease area. The proposed lease area would be accessible by a proposed approximate 6750foot long by 30-foot wide (205m by 9m) access/utility easement. The facility would also include three 20-foot wide (6m) guy-wire easements measuring approximately 250 feet (76m) in length.

ECA has identified and evaluated Historic Properties, if any, within the Area of Potential Effect (APE) for visual and direct effects as directed in Section VI.D.1 and 2 of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement, effective on march 7, 2005. We have found no historic properties listed in the National Register of historic places (NRHP) with either APE. Based on our review of the files at the Georgia Historic Preservation Office (GA HPD), we identified no Historic Properties within the ¾ mile APE for visual effects.

An archaeological assessment was conducted within the PAE for direct effects. During our database research, we found one previously identified archaeology site (9GE1432) and three archaeological surveys (1013, 6657, 11907) within our standard 1-mile background research radius, but outside the APE for direct effects. Based on our findings, we recommend no further consultation under Section 106 Review of the national Historic Preservation Act for this proposed undertaking.

Based on this documentation, prepared in accordance with the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement effective March 7, 2005, ECA, believes that this proposed facility would have no effect on any Historic Properties identified in accordance with NPA. Therefore, we recommend a finding of “No effect’ for the proposed undertaking.