Back to top

Archaeological Reassessment of Project NH-006-2(55), Dougherty County

Author(s)
Report Number
4442
Year of Publication
2008
Abstract

In compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and amendments thereto, project NH-006-2(55), Dougherty County has been surveyed with respect to archaeological resources, especially those on or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP)". The purpose of the survey was to locate, identify and evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources within the proposed project's area of potential environmental effect. Project NH-006-2(55) includes redesigning the entrance and exit ramps at SR 3/Liberty Expressway and SR 133/N. Jefferson Street in Dougherty County. This project was originally surveyed by Brockington and Associates, Inc. in May of 2001 (HP001222-003). Since that time the project has been changed to include a new Park and Ride lot on the northeast side of SR 91/N. Jefferson Street approximately 160 feet south of Telfair Avenue. The new Park and Ride lot would be approximately 6,000 square feet. In addition, the right-of-way would increase on SR 91/N. Jefferson Street from a maximum of 125 feet to 175 feet. Lastly, easements for the construction of slopes have been added throughout the project totaling approximately 2.728 acres. An archaeological survey consistent with the proposed project description was conducted along the entire length of the project corridor. An archaeological survey (Level II) was conducted in accordance with "GDOT/FHWA Cultural Resource Survey Guidelines" developed by the GDOT Staff Archaeologists in consultation with DNR Historic Preservation Section Staff and concurred in by the Federal Highway Administration and State Historic Preservation Officer. These guidelines provide general survey boundaries and methodological approaches to archaeological surveys based on the type/scope of proposed highway projects and are followed during the initial identification of archaeological resources. No existing or eligible National Register archaeological resources were located within the project's area of potential environmental effect. It is concluded, therefore, that the project will have no effect upon archaeological resources on or eligible for inclusion in the NRHP provided that the project conforms to that described above.