Back to top

Cultural Resources Survey of the “WOODLAND-GA – A” Self- Support Tower Telecommunication Facility, Woodland, Talbot County, Georgia

Author(s)
Report Number
12395
Year of Publication
2018
Abstract

In February 2018, Trileaf Corporation (Trileaf) performed a cultural resource inventory survey for a proposed self-support tower telecommunication facility located in Talbot County, Woodland, Georgia (Latitude: 32° 46’ 37.20” N Longitude: 84° 33’ 37.29” W). The project location is located within a grassed field and utilizes a portion of an existing paved and gravel drive at its eastern end.

Verizon Wireless proposes the construction of a new self-support cell tower with a total height of 255 feet (77.7 meters). The new tower and associated equipment will be situated within a 100 x 100-foot (30.5 x 30.5 meter) cell tower lease area. A 30 x 750-foot (9.1 x 228.6 meter) access and utility easement will travel east, northeast, then east linking the lease area to Woodland Highway. A portion of the proposed access and utility easement utilizes an existing gravel and paved drive at its eastern end that connects the project location to Woodland Highway. Total acreage of the new construction area is approximately 0.75 acres (0.30 Hectares).

Senior Project Archaeologist Zach Horne, M.A., RPA, under the direction of Trileaf, performed this survey in response to the planned use of the above-described parcel and the potential impacts that such use might represent to archaeological and architectural cultural resources. The Phase I cultural resource survey was designed to discover all prehistoric and historical period cultural resources that might be present within the project area.

The field survey of the project area, which included a pedestrian survey, shovel testing, and visual inspection, found no evidence for the presence of archaeological or architectural properties in relation to the current project area’s Direct APE. Additionally, no National Register of Historic Places (NRHP)-eligible or listed properties were identified within the project areas Direct or Visual APE.

Based on these findings, Trileaf recommends No Historic Properties in both the Direct APE and the Visual APE. It is therefore recommended that project clearance be granted with no further investigation or evaluation of the project area relative to those resources.