Environmental Corporation of America’s (ECA) client, Mobilitie, LLC, is proposing to contruct a pole as described in the following FCC Form 620, New Tower (NT) Submission Packet. ECA understands that Mobilitie, LLC plans to construct a 49-foot overall height pole within a 10-foot by 10-foot (3-meter by 3-meter) area.
Due to the nature of the project and the surrounding setting, visibility of the proposed pole would be minimal. Therefore, we have determined that the APE for visual effects should be redefined as being limited to the areas immediately surrounding the pole site, which would be approximately 800 feet (244 meters) from the site in all directions. Therefore, the proposed alternative visual APE would be 800 feet (244 meters). Photographs of the proposed site are included in Attachment B.
ECA has identified and evaluated Historic Properties, if any, within the Area of Potential Effect (APE) for visual and direct effects as directed in Section VI.D.1 and 2 of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement, effective on March 7, 2005. The proposed undertaking is located within the boundaries of two historic properties (Martin Luther King Jr. Historic District and Martin Luther King, Jr. National Historic Site and Preservation District) listed in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) within the APE. The J.K Orr Shoe Company has also been identified within the APE for visual effects. No other properties listed in the NRHP were identified within the alternative APE for visual effects. ECA researched the files at the Georgia Historic Preservation Division (GAHPD) on November 2, 2017. Three historic resources (Martin Luther King Jr. Historic District, Martin Luther King, Jr. National Historic Site and Preservation District, and J.K Orr Shoe Company) were identified during ECA’s review of the Historic Resources Survey Files, National Register Files, Centennial Farms Files, Environmental Review Files and the Identified Site Files. The University of Georgia’s Natural, Archaeological, and Historic Resources Geographical Information System (NAHRGIS) identified no additional historic resources within the alternative APE for visual effects.
As discussed previously, an alternative APE for visual effects was assessed for the proposed undertaking. View back locations were determined based on a visual assessment and potential views of the proposed undertaking that were unencumbered by intervening structures and/or vegetation. For selected view back locations, photographs have been annotated in order to better convey the location of the proposed support structure. These photograph annotations only identify approximate locations. Photographs of the proposed undertaking and of representative locations within the alternative APE for visual effects are included in Attachment B.
Help us to continue to make advances in research, stewardship, and bringing the past to life. No matter the size of the gift, your contribution will directly support groundbreaking archaeological research through sustaining student and outreach programs, and technological innovations. To make a secure gift online to the Archaeology Lab Fund, CLICK HERE.