Back to top

Archaeological Assessment of Project CSSTP-M003-00(063), McDuffie County

Author(s)
Report Number
4244
Year of Publication
2008
Abstract

In compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and amendments thereto, project CSSTP-M003-00(063), McDuffie County has been surveyed with respect to archaeological resources, especially those on or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP)". The purpose of the survey was to locate, identify and evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources within the proposed project's area of potential environmental effect. The proposed project would consist of the resurfacing, permanent striping, raised pavement marking & loop detector installation, railroad grade crossing sign installation & marking, and curb cut/wheelchair ramp construction on SR 17 in McDuffie County, Georgia. The proposed project would begin on SR 17 at a point approximately 132 feet south of Guill Street (MP 8.633) then continue northerly to an end point approximately 391 feet north of SR 10 (MP 10.617). All project construction will be restricted to within the existing right-of-way on SR 17. An archaeological survey consistent with the proposed project description was conducted for the entire length of the project corridor. An archaeological survey (Level I) was conducted in accordance with "GDOT/FHWA Cultural Resource Survey Guidelines" developed by the GDOT Staff Archaeologists in consultation with DNR Historic Preservation Section Staff and concurred in by the Federal Highway Administration and State Historic Preservation Officer. These guidelines provide general survey boundaries and methodological approaches to archaeological surveys based on the type/scope of proposed highway projects and are followed during the initial identification of archaeological resources. By agreement, because no archaeological resources were located within the project's area of potential effect, no signed concurrence from the State Historic Preservation Office is required. It is concluded, therefore, that the project will have no effect upon archaeological resources on or eligible for inclusion in the NRHP provided that the project conforms to that described above.