Back to top

Archaeological Assessment of Project CSSTP-0008-00(592), Dekalb County

Author(s)
Report Number
1329
Year of Publication
2007
County
Abstract

In compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and amendments thereto, project CSSTP-0008-00(592), Dekalb County, has been surveyed with respect to archeological resources, especially those on or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The purpose of the survey was to locate, identify and evaluate the significance of any archeological resources within the proposed project's area of potential environmental effect. The proposed project would consist of the upgrade of existing traffic signal equipment, provide for pedestrian facilities which include the installation of wheelchair ramps, pedestrian signals, and traffic striping at the following intersections: La Vista Road at Northlake Parkway, Montreal Road, Henderson Mill Road, Briarcliff Road, Ranchwood Drive, Parklake Drive, and 1-285 Southbound and Northbound; Northlake Parkway at Northlake Center, 1-285 Southbound, Parklake Drive, and Crescent Center Boulevard; Henderson Mill Road at Northlake Parkway, Briarcliff Way, Fielding Drive, Briarcliff Road/Northlake Mall, and Briarcliff Village; Briarcliff Road at Briarcliff Way, Cravey Drive and Henderson Mill Road; and Parklake Road at Weems Road. All proposed improvements would take place within existing right-of-way. An archeological survey (Level II) was conducted in accordance with "GDOT/FHWA Cultural Resource Survey Guidelines" developed by the GDOT Staff Archeologists in consultation with DNR Historic Preservation Division Staff and concurred in by the Federal Highway Administration and State Historic Preservation Officer. These guidelines provide general survey boundaries and methodological approaches to archeological surveys based on the type/scope of work of proposed highway projects and are followed during the initial identification of archaeological resources. By agreement, since no archaeological resources were located within the project's area of potential effect, no signed concurrence form the State Historic Preservation Officer is required. It is concluded, therefore, that the project will have no effect upon archaeological resources on or eligible for inclusion in the NRHP provided that the project conforms to that described above.