Back to top

Cultural Resources Survey of the “DANIELSVILLE_NORTH - A” Monopole Tower Telecommunication Facility, Danielsville, Madison County, Georgia Trileaf # 647767

Author(s)
Report Number
13863
Year of Publication
2019
County
Abstract

In March 2019, Trileaf Corporation (Trileaf) performed a cultural resource inventory survey for a monopole tower telecommunication facility located in Madison County, Danielsville, Georgia (Latitude: 34° 09’ 02.26” N, Longitude: -83° 12’ 06.48” W). The project location is located within a grassed and wooded area, and utilizes a portion of an existing gravel drive at its northwestern end. Verizon Wireless proposes the construction of a new monopole tower with a total height of 191 feet (58.2 meters). The new tower and associated equipment will be situated within a 100 x 100-foot (30.5 x 30.5 meter) cell tower lease area. A proposed approximate 30 x 145-foot (9.1 x 44.2 meter) access easement will travel northwest, then generally west to an existing gravel drive, linking the lease area to Wildcat Bridge Road. Utilities will be granted via a new proposed approximate 10-foot x 51-foot (3.1-meter x 15.6-meter) utility easement extending northeast from the lease area to an existing power pole. Total acreage of the new construction area is approximately 0.34 acres (0.14 Hectares). Senior Project Archaeologist Zach Horne, M.A., RPA, under the direction of Trileaf, performed this survey in response to the planned use of the above-described parcel and the potential impacts that such use might represent to archaeological and architectural cultural resources. The Phase I cultural resource survey was designed to discover all prehistoric and historical period cultural resources that might be present within the project area. The field survey of the project area, which included a pedestrian survey, shovel testing, and visual inspection, found no evidence for the presence of archaeological or architectural properties in relation to the current project area’s Direct APE. Additionally, no National Register of Historic Places (NRHP)-eligible or listed properties were identified within the project areas Direct or Visual APE. Based on these findings, Trileaf recommends No Historic Properties in both the Direct APE and the ½- mile Visual APE. It is therefore recommended that project clearance be granted with no further investigation or evaluation of the project area relative to those resources.