Back to top

Archaeological reassessment of Project IM-NH-20-1(73), Douglas County

Author(s)
Report Number
2640
Year of Publication
2004
County
Abstract

In compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and amendments thereto, project IM-NH-20-1(73), Douglas County, has been surveyed with respect to archaeological resources, especially those on or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The purpose of the survey was to locate, identify and evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources within the proposed project's area of potential environmental effect. The original project would consist of widening and reconstruction of the SR 92 bridge and approaches over 1-20, beginning approximately 150' south of the eastbound 1-20 ramps and end at the intersection of South Cherokee Boulevard. Westmorland Plaza frontage road would be relocated to provide access to South Cherokee Boulevard, and North Cherokee Boulevard would be realigned with South Cherokee Boulevard. Proposed changes include the addition of a third travel lane in each direction, and extending the project approximately 500' to the north. Previous required right-of-way was approximately 7'; current required right-of-way varies between 30-40'. An archaeological survey consistent with the project description was conducted for the entire length of the project corridor. An archaeological survey (Level II) was conducted in accordance with "GDOT / FHWA Cultural Resource Survey Guidelines" developed by the GDOT Staff Archaeologists in consultation with DNR Historic Preservation Division Staff and concurred in by the Federal Highway Administration and State Historic Preservation Officer. These guidelines provide general survey boundaries and methodological approaches to archaeological surveys based on the type/scope of work of proposed highway projects and are followed during the initial identification of archaeological resources. No existing or eligible National Register resources were located within the project's area of potential environmental effect. It is concluded, therefore, that the project will have no effect upon archaeological resources on or eligible for inclusion in the NRHP provided that the project conforms to that described above.