Back to top

Cultural Resource Survey For the Proposed Macedonia Substation and Transmission Line in Towns County, Georgia

Report Number
4330
Year of Publication
2008
Abstract

Between April 22 and April 24, 2008, TRC conducted a cultural resources survey of the proposed Macedonia Substation and approximately 500 feet of connecting transmission line easement in Towns County, Georgia. One previously recorded archaeological site was re-located during the survey. The site consists of an indeterminate prehistoric component, as evidenced by non-diagnostic lithic material, as well as a nineteenth- through early twentieth-century component manifested in the form of a single alkaline-glazed stoneware sherd. Initially recorded by New South Associates, Inc. in 1998 and recommended as ineligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), TRC recommends that the site should retain that status. TRC also conducted auger testing in the project area and found no potential for deeply buried archaeological deposits. An architectural and historical assessment of above-ground buildings and structures was conducted within a 0.5-mile radius of the project, examining resources that appeared to be a minimum of 50 years of age or that exhibited features of exceptional historical and/or architectural significance. A literature and records search was performed prior to the fieldwork. One previously recorded resource (Survey #39) was identified within a 0.5-mile radius of the project and has been demolished. Eighteen additional resources were identified within the project's Area of Potential Effects (APE) as a result of this assessment. The structures date from 1915 to 1957. In accordance with the eligibility criteria outlined in 36 CFR 60.4, TRC recommends properties HR-2, HR-8 through HR- 13, and HR- 15 through HR- 18 eligible for the NRHP due primarily to their significance in architecture. As proposed, it appears that the project will create a visual effect on these resources that will not be adverse. TRC recommends the remaining identified resources (HR-1, HR-3 through HR-7, and HR-14) ineligible for the NRHP due to loss of integrity caused by alterations, the lack of unique architectural features, or due to the fact that they do not meet Criteria Consideration D. Based on the findings of the assessment, no further architectural/historical analysis is recommended for the resources. In summary, no further consideration of cultural resources is recommended in advance of the proposed undertaking.