Back to top

Archaeological Survey of Additional Wideners Associated with the Proposed Widening of US80/SR26 from Bull River to Lazaretto Creek, Chatham County, Georgia

Author(s)
Report Number
9597
Year of Publication
2001
Abstract

The Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) has proposed a project to widen

US 80/SR 26 from just west of Bull River to just east of Lazaretto Creek in Chatham

County, Georgia. The proposed project will widen the existing roadway to four

lanes, widen the existing bridges and construct two additional bridges over Bull

River and Lazaretto Creek. In order to identify potentially significant cultural

resources in the project area, GDOT contracted with Tidewater Atlantic Research,

Inc. (TAR) of Washington, North Carolina to conduct a pedestrian and submerged

remote sensing survey of those areas to be impacted by projected related activities.

That survey was conducted in June 1999 and revealed no cultural resources within

the study area. In 2000, GDOT issued a modification of the right-of-way in selected

portions of the US 80 I SR 26 project area. In order to identify potentially significant

cultural resources in the extended project area, GDOT contracted again with TAR to

conduct a pedestrian and terrestrial magnetometer survey of those modified areas to

be impacted by construction activities. The work performed consisted of a

background literature review, a magnetic and pedestrian archaeological survey of

the tidal marsh and a pedestrian archaeological survey of a relic land surface east of

Lazaretto Creek. Fieldwork activities were conducted on 12 April 2001. The

pedestrian and remote sensing survey of the tidal marsh between the two crossings

revealed no cultural resources within the modified sections of the project area. The

survey of the east bank of Lazaretto Creek on the north side of the road way

revealed that the modified right-of-way is located in an area that has been highly

impacted by past road improvements and other construction activities and contains

no intact cultural resources. As a consequence of these results, no further

investigation is recommended for the proposed project.