Back to top

Archaeological Assessment of Project STP-0000-00(424), Douglas County

Report Number
12336
Year of Publication
2000
County
Abstract

In compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and amendments thereto, project STP-0000-00(424), Douglas County, has been surveyed with respect to archaeological resources, especially those on or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The purpose of the survey was to locate, identify and evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources within the proposed project's area of potential environmental effect. The proposed project would upgrade and reconstruct the interchange at SR 5 and Rose A venue in Douglas County. Left and right turn lanes will be constructed and Rose Avenue will be realigned to form at intersection with SR 5. Existing right-of-way varies from 100 to 160 feet. Additional required right-of-way will vary from 40 to 80 feet. Improvements on SR 5 would begin approximately 850 feet south and end approximately 1,200 feet north of the intersection with Rose Avenue. Improvements on Rose Avenue would begin at the SR 5 intersection and proceed approximately 1060 feet northwest. An archaeological survey consistent with the project description was conducted for the entire 0.59-rnile length of the project corridor. An archaeological survey (Level II) was conducted in accordance with "GDOT/FHW A Cultural Resource Survey Guidelines" developed by the GDOT Staff Archaeologists in consultation with DNR Historic Preservation Division Staff and concurred in by the Federal Highway Administration and State Historic Preservation Officer. These guidelines provide general survey boundaries and methodological approaches to archaeological surveys based on the type/scope of work of proposed highway projects and are followed during the initial identification of archaeological resources. No existing or eligible National Register resources were located within the project's area of potential environmental effect. It is concluded, therefore, that the project will have no effect upon archaeological resources on or eligible for inclusion in the NRHP provided that the project conforms to that described above.