Back to top

Cultural Resources Survey of the “Eastman-Buford, GA” Guyed Tower Telecommunication Facility, Eastman, Dodge County, Georgia

Author(s)
Report Number
13354
Year of Publication
2019
County
Abstract

In July 2019, Trileaf Corporation (Trileaf) performed a cultural resource inventory survey for a proposed guyed tower telecommunication facility located in Dodge County, Eastman, Georgia (Latitude: 32° 07’ 15.16” Longitude: -83° 16’ 4.65”). Currently, the proposed guy wire easements, access/utility easement, and tower compound lease area are located partially within a maintained grassed lawn and partially within a sparsely wooded area.

GST Capital Partners, LLC proposes the construction of a new guyed tower with a total height of 350 feet (106.7 meters). The new tower and associated equipment will be situated within a 100 x 100-foot (30.5 x 30.5 meter) cell tower lease area. A proposed approximate 30 x750-foot (9.1 x 228.6 meter) access and utility easement will travel generally northwest, then northeast, then northwest again linking the lease area to Lower Rocky Springs Road. Additionally, three (3) proposed approximate 30 x 175-foot (9.1 x 53.3 meter) guy wire easements will extend northwest, northeast, and south-southwest from the lease area. Total acreage of the new construction area is approximately 0.98 acres (0.40 Hectares).

Senior Project Archaeologist Zach Horne, M.A., RPA, under the direction of Trileaf, performed this survey in response to the planned use of the above-described parcel and the potential impacts that such use might represent to archaeological and architectural cultural resources. The Phase I cultural resource survey was designed to discover all prehistoric and historical period cultural resources that might be present within the project area.

The field survey of the project area, which included a pedestrian survey, shovel testing, and visual inspection, found no evidence for the presence of archaeological or architectural properties in relation to the current project area’s Direct APE. Additionally, no National Register of Historic Places (NRHP)-eligible or listed properties were identified within the project areas Direct or Visual APE.

Based on these findings, Trileaf recommends No Historic Properties in both the Direct APE and the ¾-mile Visual APE. It is therefore recommended that project clearance be granted with no further investigation or evaluation of the project area relative to those resources.