Back to top

Section 106 Review TCNS ID 133552 Proposed 150-Foot Monopole Communications Structure (163-Foot Overall Height Including Appurtenances) Grovetown Substation Wrightsboro Road Grovetown, Columbia County, Georgia ECA Project No. R1539

Report Number
13743
Year of Publication
2015
County
Abstract

Environmental Corporation of America’s (ECA) client, Georgia Power Company, is proposing to construct a communications facility as described in the following FCC Form 620, New Tower (NT) Submission Packet. ECA understands that Georgia Power Company plans to construct a 163-foot overall height monopole communications structure within an 8-foot by 8-foot (2-meter by 2-meter) monopole site area.

ECA has identified and evaluated Historic Properties, if any, within the Area of Potential Effect (APE) for visual and direct effects as directed in Section VI.D.1 and 2 of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement, effective on March 7, 2005. We have found no properties listed in or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) within either APE.

Based on our review of the files at the Georgia Historic Preservation Office (GA HPD) and Georgia’s Natural, Archaeological, and Historic Resources Geographical Information System (GNAHRGIS), we identified no historic resources inside the ½-mile APE for visual effects. In addition, no historic resources were identified in the Environmental Review Files, Site ID Files, or in the Centennial Farm Files within the ½-mile APE for visual effects.

An Archaeological Assessment was conducted within the APE for direct effects. During our database research, we found seven previously recorded archaeological sites (9CB633, 9CB634, 9CB641, 9CB642, 9CB643, 9CB644, 9CB645) and three survey reports (7355, 8412, 8498) within our standard 1-mile background research radius. The previously recorded archaeological sites and survey reports are not within or near the APE for direct effects. During our fieldwork, we uncovered no archaeological sites (see Attachment E-1c). Based on our findings, we recommend no further consultation under Section 106 Review of the National Historic Preservation Act for this proposed undertaking. Based on this documentation, prepared in accordance with the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement effective March 7, 2005, ECA believes that this proposed facility would have no effect on any Historic Properties identified in accordance with the NPA. Therefore, we recommend a finding of "No Effect" for the proposed undertaking.