Environmental Corporation of America’s (ECA) client, Southern Communications Services, Inc., d/b/a Southern Linc c/o Value Concepts, Inc., is proposing to construct a telecommunications facility as described in the following FCC Form 620, New Tower (NT) Submission Packet. ECA understands that Southern Communications Services, Inc., d/b/a Southern Linc c/o Value Concepts, Inc., plans to construct a 320-foot tall (overall height) guyedtype telecommunications structure within a 100-foot by 100-foot (30-meter by 30-meter) lease area. The proposed lease area would be accessible by a proposed approximate 1,170-foot long by 30-foot wide (357-meter by 9-meter) access/utility easement and would include three proposed guy-wire easements extending to the north, southeast, and southwest and each measuring approximately 199 feet (61 meters) long by 50 feet (15 meters) wide. ECA has identified and evaluated Historic Properties, if any, within the Area of Potential Effect (APE) for visual and direct effects as directed in Section VI.D.1 and 2 of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement, effective on March 7, 2005. No properties were identified as listed in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) within either APE. ECA researched the files at the Georgia Historic Preservation Division (GAHPD) on January 30, 2020. During our research at the GAHPD we identified no historic resources listed in the Morgan County Survey Files, Identified Site Files, Topical Files, Environmental Review Files, or the Centennial Farms Files within our ¾-mile APE for visual effects. During our research on the University of Georgia’s Natural, Archaeological, and Historic Resource Geographic Information System (GNAHRGIS), we identified four historic resources (200174, 200175, 200177, and 200189) within the ¾-mile APE for visual effects. These resources have not been evaluated for listing on the NRHP. As a result, no Historic Properties that are eligible or listed in the NRHP were identified within the project’s visual APE. An Archaeological Assessment was conducted within the APE for direct effects. During the database research, we identified nine previously recorded archaeological sites (9GE110, 9MG207, 9MG222, 9MG613, 9MG614, 9MG615, 9MG642, 9MG644, and 9MG645) and one archaeological survey (678) within our standard 1-mile background research radius, but outside of our APE for Direct Effects. During our fieldwork we uncovered no archeological cultural artifacts (see Attachment E-1c). Based on our findings, we recommend no further consultation under Section 106 Review of the National Historic Preservation Act for this proposed undertaking.
Based on this documentation, prepared in accordance with the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement effective March 7, 2005, ECA believes that this proposed facility would have no effect on any Historic Properties identified in accordance with the NPA. Therefore, we recommend a finding of "No Effect" for the proposed undertaking.
Help us to continue to make advances in research, stewardship, and bringing the past to life. No matter the size of the gift, your contribution will directly support groundbreaking archaeological research through sustaining student and outreach programs, and technological innovations. To make a secure gift online to the Archaeology Lab Fund, CLICK HERE.