Back to top

Archaeological Assessment of Project CSSTP-0008-00(588), Fulton County

Author(s)
Report Number
4109
Year of Publication
2007
County
Abstract

In compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and amendments thereto, project CSSTP-0008-00(588), Fulton County have been surveyed with respect to archaeological resources, especially those on or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP)". The purpose of the survey was to locate, identify and evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources within the proposed project's area of potential environmental effect. This project would consist of the upgrading of traffic signal equipment, the installation of wheelchair ramps, pedestrian signals and traffic striping at Norcross Street with its intersection with Forest/Frazier Street, and the intersection of Old Alabama Road at Riverside Road and continuing east to the intersection of Old Alabama Road and Roxburgh Drive (see attached location maps). The intersections to be improved include Norcross Street at Forest/Frazier Street, Old Alabama Road at Holcomb Woods Parkway, Old Alabama Road at Market Boulevard, Old Alabama Road at Old Alabama Connector, Old Alabama Road at Riverside Road, Old Alabama Road at Rouse Lane, Old Alabama Road at Roxburgh Drive, and Old Alabama Road at Wooten Road. All work would be completed within the existing right-of-way. An archaeological survey (Level I) was conducted in accordance with "GDOT/FHWA Cultural Resource Survey Guidelines" developed by the GDOT Staff Archaeologists in consultation with DNR Historic Preservation Section Staff and concurred in by the Federal Highway Administration and State Historic Preservation Officer. These guidelines provide general survey boundaries and methodological approaches to archaeological surveys based on the type/scope of proposed highway projects and are followed during the initial identification of archaeological resources. By agreement, because no existing or eligible National Register archaeological resources were located within the project's area of potential environmental effect, no signed concurrence from the State Historic Preservation Office is required. It is concluded, therefore, that the project will have no effect upon archaeological resources on or eligible for inclusion in the NRHP provided that the project conforms to that described above.