Back to top

Archaeological Assessment of a District 6 State Aid Resurfacing and Maintenance Project

Author(s)
Report Number
8073
Year of Publication
2013
Abstract

"In compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and amendments thereto, the resurfacing project in Walker County, has been surveyed with respect to archeological resources, especially those on or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The purpose of the survey was to locate, identify and evaluate the significance of any archeological resources within the proposed project's area of potential environmental effect.

The proposed project would consist of the milling, patching, resurfacing, striping, and construction of traffic signal loops along CR 704/McFarland A venue in the city of Rossville. The project would begin at the Rossville city limits and extend to the US 27 /SR 1 intersection and extend in a westerly direction to the North Division Street/CS 105009 intersection. The total length of the project would be approximately 1.70 miles. Project implementation would also consist of the construction of Type Band D curb cut (wheelchair) ramps at various locations along the length of the project (see attached map for locations). All construction activity would occur within the existing right-of-way.

An archeological survey (Level I) was conducted in accordance with "GDOT/FHW A Cultural Resource Survey Guidelines" developed by the GDOT Staff Archeologists in consultation with DNR Historic Preservation Division Staff and concurred in by the Federal Highway Administration and State Historic Preservation Officer. These guidelines provide general survey boundaries and methodological approaches to archeological surveys based on the type/scope of work of proposed highway projects and are followed during the initial identification of archaeological resources.

By agreement, since no archaeological resources were located within the project's area of potential effect, no signed concurrence form the State Historic Preservation Officer is required. It is concluded, therefore, that the project will have no effect upon archaeological resources on or eligible for inclusion in the NRHP provided that the project conforms to that described above.