Rotenstein, David S.

Report Number Author(s) Title Abstract Summary County Year
10261 Rotenstein, David S. BRS-0729(6), Evans Co.
  1. Road: S.R. 129
  2. Stream name: Cedar Creek
  3. Stream classif.
  4. Type and size of existing structure and ROW: 200’x23.8’, 100’ Existing R/W
 Evans 1985
10263 Rotenstein, David S. BHF-068-1(21), Evans Co.
  1. Road: S.R. 73 & U.S. 301
  2. Stream name: Canoochee River
  3. Stream classif.: Fishing
  4. Type and size of existing structure and ROW: 23.8’ x 219.95 conc. Bridge – 200’ existing R/W
 Evans 1985
10282 Rotenstein, David S. BRZLB-111(8), Fannin Co.
  1. Road: Bridge over Wilscot Creek
  2. Stream name: Wilscot Creek
  3. Stream classif.: Fishing
  4. Type and size of existing structure and ROW: 33x12 steel I beams with wood deck, 42 feet exist. R/W
 Fannin 1985
10283 Rotenstein, David S. BRSLB-1790(2), Doughtery Co.
  1. Road: CR 545
  2. Stream name: Dry Creek
  3. Stream classif.:
  4. Type and size of existing structure and ROW: 19’ pavement; 2’-5’ shoulders; bridge 148’ x 18.7’ concrete substructure
 Dougherty 1985
10375 Rotenstein, David S. Project BRF-005-5(15), P.I. No. 521320, Chatham County

Project BRF-005-5(15), Chatham County would consist of the replacement of the Bay Street Viaduct on U.S . 17/S.R. 25 Alternate (Bay Street) in Savannah over the Central of Georgia railroad tracks. Project limits would extend from East Lathrop Avenue to Fahm Street (see Figure 2).

 Chatham 1986
10376 Rotenstein, David S. Archaeological Assessment of Project FR-097-1 (13) Candler County

"In compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and amendments thereto, project FR-097-1(13), Candler County has been surveyed with respect to archaeological resources, especially those on or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places (NRH

 Candler 1987
10407 Rotenstein, David S. Archaeological Assessment of Project BRZLB-225 (3), Peach County

“In compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and amendments thereto, project BRZLB-225(3), Peach County, has been surveyed with respect to archaeological resources, especially those on or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP

 Peach 1984
10449 Rotenstein, David S. Archaeological Assessment of Project FR-006-4 (20), Pike-Spalding

“In compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and amendments thereto, project FR-006-4(20), Pike-Spalding Counties has been surveyed with respect to archaeological resources, especially those on or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Pla

 Pike 1987
10501 Rotenstein, David S. Archaeological Assessment of Project AHL-2688(3), Hall County

"In compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and amendments thereto, project AHL-2688(3), Hall County has been surveyed with respect to archaeological resources, especially those on or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP).

 Hall 1986
10550 Rotenstein, David S. Archaeological Assessment of Project BRF-068-1 (18), Long-Tattnall

"In compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and amendments thereto, project BRF- a68-1 (18), Long-Tattnall has been surveyed with respect to archaeological resources, especially those on or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places (N

 Long 1985
Displaying 71 - 80 of 244