Rotenstein, David S.

1. Road: S.R. 129
2. Stream name: Cedar Creek
3. Stream classif.
4. Type and size of existing structure and ROW: 200’x23.8’, 100’ Existing R/W

1. Road: S.R. 73 & U.S. 301
2. Stream name: Canoochee River
3. Stream classif.: Fishing
4. Type and size of existing structure and ROW: 23.8’ x 219.95 conc. Bridge – 200’ existing R/W

1. Road: Bridge over Wilscot Creek
2. Stream name: Wilscot Creek
3. Stream classif.: Fishing
4. Type and size of existing structure and ROW: 33x12 steel I beams with wood deck, 42 feet exist. R/W

1. Road: CR 545
2. Stream name: Dry Creek
3. Stream classif.:
4. Type and size of existing structure and ROW: 19’ pavement; 2’-5’ shoulders; bridge 148’ x 18.7’ concrete substructure

Project BRF-005-5(15), Chatham County would consist of the replacement of the Bay Street Viaduct on U.S . 17/S.R. 25 Alternate (Bay Street) in Savannah over the Central of Georgia railroad tracks. Project limits would extend from East Lathrop Avenue to Fahm Street (see Figure 2).

"In compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and amendments thereto, project FR-097-1(13), Candler County has been surveyed with respect to archaeological resources, especially those on or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places (NRH

“In compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and amendments thereto, project BRZLB-225(3), Peach County, has been surveyed with respect to archaeological resources, especially those on or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP

“In compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and amendments thereto, project FR-006-4(20), Pike-Spalding Counties has been surveyed with respect to archaeological resources, especially those on or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Pla

"In compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and amendments thereto, project AHL-2688(3), Hall County has been surveyed with respect to archaeological resources, especially those on or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP).

"In compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and amendments thereto, project BRF- a68-1 (18), Long-Tattnall has been surveyed with respect to archaeological resources, especially those on or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places (N