12908
|
Entorf, Robert F.
|
Archaeological Assessment of Project FR-114-1(68) Paulding County
|
In compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and amendments thereto, project FR-114-1(68), Paulding County has been surveyed with respect to archaeological resources, especially those on or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places (NRH
|
Paulding
|
1989
|
12911
|
Entorf, Robert F.
|
Archaeological Assessment of Project BRS-1575(5), Jefferson-Glascock
|
The proposed project would replace the existing bridges over Rocky Comfort Creek, Rocky Comfort Creek overflow, Deep Creek and Long Branch Creek on SR 80 between Gibson and Avera.
|
Jefferson
|
1988
|
12989
|
Entorf, Robert F.
|
Archaeology Assessment of Project EDS-441(14) Habersham County
|
In compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and amendments thereto, project EDS-441(14), Habersham County has been surveyed with respect to archaeological resources, especially those on or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places (NRH
|
Habersham
|
1988
|
12992
|
Entorf, Robert F.
|
Archaeology Assessment of Projects FR-002-1(43) & (46) Ware County
|
In compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and amendments thereto, projects FR-002-1(43) & (46), Ware County has been surveyed with respect to archaeological resources, especially those on or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Pla
|
Ware
|
1987
|
13036
|
Entorf, Robert F.
|
ECA was contracted by Southern Communications Services, d/b/a Southern Linc c/o Value Concepts, Inc. to perform an archaeological assessment as part of the Section 106 Review process for the proposed telecommunications facility. The proposed facility is l
|
In compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and amendments thereto, project EDS-565(1), Effingham County has been surveyed with respect to archaeological resources, especially those on or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP
|
Effingham
|
1991
|
13079
|
Entorf, Robert F.
|
Archaeological Assessment of Project STP-0573(14) Telfair County
|
In compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and amendments thereto, project STP-0573 (14), Telfair County has been surveyed with respect to archaeological resources, especially those on or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places (NRH
|
Telfair
|
1996
|
13080
|
Entorf, Robert F.
|
Archaeological Assessment of Project PRP-32(191) McIntosh County
|
In compliance with the Georgia Environmental Protection Act of 1991, the proposed project has been surveyed with respect to archaeological resources, especially those on or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP).
|
McIntosh
|
1993
|
13153
|
Moore, Sherry Fleming, Entorf, Robert F.
|
Archaeological Assessment of Project STP-114-1(104), Lumpkin County
|
In compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and amendments thereto, project STP-114-1(104), Lumpkin County, has been surveyed with respect to archaeological resources, especially those on or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places (N
|
Lumpkin
|
1999
|
13174
|
Entorf, Robert F.
|
Archaeological Assessment of Projects SR-0869 (10) & (12), F-035-1(26), and BHS-0869(11) Rockdale County
|
In compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and amendments thereto, projects SR-0869(10) & (12), FR-035-1(26), and BHS-0869(11) Rockdale County have been surveyed with respect to archaeological resources, especially those on or eligible for inclusion in th
|
Rockdale
|
1989
|
13217
|
Entorf, Robert F.
|
Archaeological Assessment of Project BRF-062-1(16), Johnson County
|
Big Cedar Creek project begins 700’ west of stream and ends 800’ east of stream. Little Cedar Creek project begins 600’ west of stream and ends 600’ east of stream. New structures are 40’ x 500’ bridge and triple 10’ x 10’ culvert respectively.
|
Johnson
|
1990
|