Report Abstracts

In compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and amendments thereto, project S.R. l 666(9) Cobb County has been surveyed with respect to archaeological resources, especially those on or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP).

In compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, archaeological surveys were conducted with the following projects between March 21-23, 1979. This report is a series of bridge replacements and 404 permit requests in District Four.

In compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and amendments thereto, project LAB-12 -238-3(073), Columbia Co., has been surveyed with respect to archaeological resources, especially those on or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places

In compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and amendments thereto, project FR-023- 2(6), Coffee County has been surveyed with respect to archaeological resources, especially those on or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP)

150’ x 38’ bridge; no wetland involvement, no archaeological sites.

Project begins 650’ west of Gum swamp and ends 650’ east of Gum swamp. Project begins 350’ west of Alligator and end 350’ east of Alligator. New structures and 38’ x 360’ and 38’ x 160’ respectively. No right of way will be required.

In compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and amendments thereto, project F-167-1(8), Floyd County, has been surveyed with respect to archaeological resources, especially those on or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP).

In compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and amendments thereto, project BRZLB-pl23(5), Gilmer Co., has been surveyed with respect to archaeolog1cal resources, especially those on or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP).

In compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and amendments thereto, project MR-9012(7) & (8), DeKalb County has been surveyed with respect to archaeological resources, especially those on or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Place

In compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and amendments thereto, project FR-036-1(13), Coffee County has been surveyed with respect to archaeological resources, especially those on or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP)